Katie Holmes has not told her friends sheâ€™s pregnant with Jamie Foxxâ€™s baby, despite a ridiculous tabloid report. Gossip Cop can exclusively debunk this claim. A rep for the actress tells us sheâ€™s not expecting a child.
According to Womanâ€™s Day, Holmes recently divulged to pals over lunch that she and Foxx are having a baby together. A so-called â€śsourceâ€ť tells the magazine, â€śRumors have been swirling for ages because Katieâ€™s stopped drinking alcohol and has been covering up in baggy clothes. But last week, she finally fessed up to friends.â€ť The unreliable outlets insists the baby is a girl and is due in December.
The alleged insider further contends that Holmes has â€śhad a few health complications that have required her to be on bed rest,â€ť but sheâ€™s starting to feel better again. â€śJamie has been amazing and has gone to every single doctorâ€™s appointment,â€ť adds the seemingly nonexistent source. â€śEveryone is over the moon for Katie as they know how long sheâ€™s wanted another baby.â€ť
This entire saga is based on information from an anonymous and untraceable â€śsource,â€ť but Holmesâ€™ own spokesperson tells Gossip Cop on the record that sheâ€™s not pregnant. And as weâ€™ve stressed several times, her relationship with Foxx isnâ€™t one thatâ€™s leading towards marriage and children. Reputable publications such as People have backed up this fact. The trusted entertainment outlet recently noted that the pair â€śarenâ€™t focused on whatâ€™s next or what the future holds.â€ť
The respected magazine further stated that Holmes and Foxx â€śdonâ€™t want to be labeled as a couple.â€ť The duo enjoy each otherâ€™s company when their schedules allow it, but they have their own separate lives. In addition to the casual nature of Holmesâ€™ romance with the actor, her rep confirms sheâ€™s not expecting a child.
Unfortunately, Womanâ€™s Day just wonâ€™t let this bogus narrative go away. Gossip Cop called out the tabloid last week for falsely claiming that Holmes was hiding a â€śbaby bumpâ€ť while walking around New York City. In that version of the story, her unborn child was said to belong to either Foxx or Joshua Jackson.
Itâ€™s also worth noting, the untrustworthy tabloid canâ€™t keep track of its lies. If one were to believe this latest article, then Holmes would be around two months pregnant with Foxxâ€™s child. Last month, however, the magazine said Holmes renewed a romance with Jackson following the recent â€śDawsonâ€™s Creekâ€ť reunion. Itâ€™s fairly obvious the outlet is making this all up as it goes along.