Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx did not â€ścall offâ€ť a wedding, despite a report claiming they have â€śsplit.â€ť Gossip Cop can bust this misguided story, which is based on two false premises: Holmes and Foxx never had a wedding in the works in the first place, and they have never been a full-on couple.
But RadarOnline is announcing that â€śthe wedding is offâ€ť now that Holmes and Foxx have supposedly â€ścall[ed] it quits.â€ť Itâ€™s specifically alleged the actress was â€śin the midst of planning her dream weddingâ€ť when she had a â€śsudden change of a heart,â€ť leading them to cancel â€śthe intimate dream wedding theyâ€™d been planning.â€ť A so-called â€śpalâ€ť is quoted as saying, â€śKatie just couldnâ€™t get over her trust issues.â€ť
The site alleges Holmes and Foxx originally planned to â€ścelebrate their love with a wedding in Paris and a lavish honeymoonâ€ť at a cost of $300,000. But now sheâ€™s â€ścalled the whole thing offâ€ť and is â€śdevastated,â€ť asserts the supposed source. Previously, maintains the blog, they â€śwanted to spend all their time together,â€ť a laughable claim considering Holmes and Foxx have only been seen together a handful of times.
The website also repeats the myth that Holmes had to abide by a â€ś5-year dating banâ€ť from her divorce with Tom Cruise before she could confirm she and Foxx were in a relationship. That (nonexistent) agreement wouldâ€™ve expired last summer, and still neither one of them have ever spoken about dating one another. The outlet goes on to allege that despite them being free to flaunt a romance, Foxx wouldnâ€™t â€ślet goâ€ť of â€śsingle behaviors,â€ť which â€śrubbed Katie the wrong way,â€ť leading her to â€śdraw up a prenup with a no-cheating clause.â€ť
â€śJamie balked at the idea of signing,â€ť claims the alleged tipster, who contends Holmes eventually â€ścalled up Jamie to tell him she couldnâ€™t do this anymore.â€ť The publication further claims sheâ€™s already â€śstarted to move onâ€ť by going on a â€śfew dates with an NYC lawyer [sic].â€ť Of course, she hasnâ€™t been seen on any such outings. Itâ€™s also doesnâ€™t make sense that the â€śDawsonâ€™s Creekâ€ť star would already be moving on to a new beau if was so â€śdevastatedâ€ť over the supposedly canceled wedding.
Hereâ€™s whatâ€™s really going on: The stars havenâ€™t been seen together since late April, and Foxx often appears like a single man when he goes out. Thatâ€™s because he is single and has been the whole time. At no point have he and Holmes been in a committed relationship.
In a February story about Holmes and Foxx being â€śsecretive,â€ť People reported, â€śThey donâ€™t see themselves as a couple in the traditional sense and they donâ€™t want to be labeled as a couple.â€ť Nothing that they have â€śseparate livesâ€ť and â€śarenâ€™t trying to join them,â€ť it was further stressed, â€śThere are no obligations, no requirements. They arenâ€™t focused on whatâ€™s next or what the future holds.â€ť
Indeed, Gossip Cop has reported for years that their casual is dynamic and there is nothing serious about it. And certainly nothing as serious as walking down the aisle. A rep for Foxx confirms to Gossip Cop that he and Holmes never had any marriage plans at all. In other words, this RadarOnline story is entirely off-base.
The site has been before, too. As seen in the screengrab below, Gossip Cop rightly busted the blog in 2016 for falsely claiming Holmes and Foxx were getting married at her Michigan home. That wedding never happened, just as we said it wouldnâ€™t, and there was no wedding in the works now either.