A website is purporting to know Brad Pittâ€™s reaction to Jennifer Anistonâ€™s InStyle interview and photo shoot. This was made-up. Gossip Cop can expose the fabrication.
On Wednesday, InStyle released its September cover story, which focuses on Aniston, who gives her first interview since splitting from Justin Theroux earlier this year. In addition to talking with her pal Molly McNearney for the feature, she also posed for a number of photos. Hours later, HollywoodLife is pretending it has the â€śdetailsâ€ť on whether Pitt is â€śnow thinking about rekindling a romance with the hottie.â€ť
A so-called â€śsourceâ€ť is quoted as saying, â€śNow that she has this recent interview with InStyle out there, he knows people will be rekindled with the interest of them getting back together and people talking about the both of them. But he isnâ€™t bothered by it.â€ť The siteâ€™s untraceable snitch goes on, â€śSo much time has past [sic] that he looks back at his time with Jen and remembers the good times and if she ever talks about him from this point forward he will be OK with it.â€ť
â€śWe all move on and he has moved on and being bothered by anything she might say about him now or in the future really doesnâ€™t do anything good for him,â€ť concludes the alleged tipster. Okay, but is Pitt thinking about â€śrekindling a romanceâ€ť with Aniston? The blog never actually says. The outlet even asks in its headline whether heâ€™s â€śmissing her,â€ť and doesnâ€™t answer that question, either.
What also makes this bizarre is that Aniston didnâ€™t talk about Pitt at all in her interview. The lone mention of him came in the very beginning, when McNearney jokingly asked her, â€śWhen are you getting back together with Brad? Did Justin ever wear your jeans? And when are the twins due?â€ť She replied, â€śYouâ€™re the only person who could start an interview like that and actually send me into hysterics, not hives.â€ť The online publication even acknowledges Aniston â€śdidnâ€™t specifically name Bradâ€ť in the article.
What she did do was speak generally about the misconceptions that â€śJen canâ€™t keep a man,â€ť and that â€śJen refuses to have a baby because sheâ€™s selfish and committed to her career.â€ť HollywoodLife doesnâ€™t offer Pittâ€™s response to those characterizations. Instead, the site babbles on and on about how theyâ€™ll always be linked, even though, as noted above, she didnâ€™t mention him at all in the interview. It is really the blog doing the linking, because it has a habit of tying exes together, whether it be Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez, or Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart.
During the previous two days, the website ran stories on all three couples. In each case, the outlet wanted readers to believe it had an â€śexclusiveâ€ť scoop, when in reality, the narratives werenâ€™t believable or even logical. Just to recap whatâ€™s going on here, Aniston is the subject of new magazine cover story in which she didnâ€™t discuss Pitt at all, but the publication is claiming to know his reaction. But instead of featuring responses to anything Aniston said, its unnamed â€śsourceâ€ť just speaks generally about how she and Pitt will always be linked. The site doesnâ€™t even fulfill its own promise to reveal whether heâ€™s â€śmissingâ€ť her and wants to â€śrekindleâ€ť their romance.
Gossip Cop is also told by a Pitt confidante, who declined to go on the record, that the quotes presented did not really come from someone in his world. That was also the case earlier this year, when the blog manufactured a story about Pittâ€™s mom supposedly being â€śso happyâ€ť that he was â€śtalking againâ€ť with Aniston. Just as that tale was clearly made-up and totally bogus, so is this new one.